Why Charles II’s Restored Monarchy Was a Disappointment
Charles II (1630-1685) was the monarch of England, Scotland, and Ireland from 27 May 1660 until his death in February 1685. He was also the ruler of all of England, Scotland, and Ireland during the Interregnum between 1649 and 1660 and again between 1660 and 1685 following the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660.
What was Restoration?
Charles and his brother, James, had grown up in exile in France. James was well-acquainted with the behavior of French society during the final years of Louis XIV’s reign; Charles had seen it all first hand. They learned to play to their audience, and that lesson served them well when they returned to England.
What were people hoping for in the Restoration?
Charles II, who was also called the Merry Monarch and the King of Pleasure, was never disappointed in that regard. But what many people wanted from him at this time was not just a return to good times but a restoration of power to Parliament. Charles soon disappointed these people, who hoped he would check the tyranny of ministers. And he angered hard-line Presbyterians, who felt their loyalty deserved better treatment than it got under Charles.
What was restored during this period?
Charles II, the son of Charles I, restored the monarchy after it was overthrown during Oliver Cromwell’s Puritan Interregnum (1649-1660). While having some liberty on paper and enjoying considerable power behind the scenes in England, Scotland, and Ireland, his restoration came at an enormous cost to many people. It led to reduced religious tolerance by way of acts such as the 1662 Act for Uniformity; there were sporadic attempts to uproot Protestant Nonconformists and Catholics alike from positions of influence; judicial power was now firmly in the hands of Anglicans appointed by Parliament. The most notable example is James Scott – later King James VII – who had been exiled to France due to his Roman Catholic faith.